The title above is my own, as the ordinance will discriminate against those who live or operate a business in the city of Kalamazoo by forcing them to accept homosexuals (or anyone in the "GLBT" group) in housing, employment, and "access to public accommodations."
According to the Kalamazoo Gazette and widely reported elsewhere, the ordinance is likely to pass, and in fact could be unanimously passed. A similar ordinance passed the City Commission unanimously in December, but was then rescinded in January after an unprecedented number of signatures were turned in for a ballot referendum on the matter. Some minor changes have since been made granting more "protections" to religious groups. Fines for violating the ordinance will be $500 a day plus expenses.
The American Family Association intends to begin circulating petitions Tuesday morning if the measure passes the commission, as most expect it will. Given the fact that no commission members have given any indication of a change of heart on the matter, we need to prepare for this. The previous petition drive was only granted 20 days to collect over a thousand signatures (over the Christmas holiday season, no less), and was successful by a comfortable margin. If you are a registered voter of Michigan and know registered voters in Kalamazoo, you can help in the petition drive. Pay attention to the AFA website and stayed tuned for further developments.
The homosexual movement wants to win as many of these local battles as they can before the inevitable day when their agenda will be placed before Congress. Do your part to promote what is right and godly in your area!
Monday, June 29, 2009
Kalamazoo Discrimination Ordinance to be Voted On Tonight!
Posted by Ken at 12:30 AM
Labels: election, homosexuals, Kalamazoo, Michigan, referendum
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Hope Kalamazoo folks show up to voice their opposition at tonight's meeting!
--Nick
www.RightMichigan.com
When your petition drive is successful, you should turn to repealing any employment protections for religious views. Since religious orientation is a personal choice, in your line of logic, it should not enjoy any civil rights protections.
Post a Comment